Assessment of biosecurity practices and adaptation of the evaluation system at mink farms using item response theory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2025-II-03

Keywords:

biosecurity, mink farms, segregation, sanitation, Item Response Theory, IRT, veterinary practices

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a study on the implementation of biosecurity practices at mink farms in the Kyiv region, utilizing the Item Response Theory (IRT) methodology, which was adapted to assess the level of biosecurity and identify key aspects requiring improvement. The primary focus is on segregation, sanitation, and management practices, which are critical for minimizing the risk of infectious disease spread. The analysis revealed significant differences between the two studied farms. The first farm demonstrated substantial gaps in the implementation of measures, whereas the second farm exhibited a more stable level of biosecurity, though some aspects remain insufficiently implemented. The study's findings provide valuable insights for developing recommendations to enhance biosecurity standards and improve farm management efficiency.

References

N. Compo, D. L. Pearl, B. Tapscott, A. Storer, J. Hammermueller, M. Brash, P. V. Turner (2017). On-farm biosecurity practices and causes of preweaning mortality in Canadian commercial mink kits. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 59, 1-11.

L. Gregers-Jensen, J. F. Agger, A. S. V. Hammer, L. Andresen, M. Chriel, E. Hagberg, ..., T. Struve (2015). Associations between biosecurity and outbreaks of canine distemper on Danish mink farms in 2012-2013. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 57, 1-7.

E. V. Korotkov, I. V. Yakovleva, A. M. Kamionskaya (2021). Use of mathematical methods for the biosafety assessment of agricultural crops. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 57, 271-279.

S. S. Lewerin, J. Osterberg, S. Alenius, M. Elvander, C. Fellstrom, M. Traven, ..., M. Jacobson (2015). Risk assessment as a tool for improving external biosecurity at farm level. BMC Veterinary Research, 11, 1-10.

S. H. Moller, S. W. Hansen, T. Rousing, J. Malmkvist (2012). WelFur-mink: development of on-farm welfare assessment protocols for mink. In Proceedings of the Xth International Scientific Congress in fur animal production (pp. 409-419). Wageningen Academic.

R. Panicz, P. Eljasik, J. Skorupski, P. Smietana, R. A. Stefansson, M. von Schmalensee, M. Szenejko (2021). Assessment of Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV) prevalence in feral American mink in Iceland. PeerJ, 9, e12060.

T. P. Peacock, W. S. Barclay (2023). Mink farming poses risks for future viral pandemics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(30), e2303408120.

A. Prieto, R. Fernandez-Antonio, J. M. Diaz-Cao, G. Lopez, P. Diaz, J. M. Alonso, ..., G. Fernandez (2017). Distribution of Aleutian mink disease virus contamination in the environment of infected mink farms. Veterinary Microbiology, 204, 59-63.

I. D. Robertson (2020). Disease control, prevention and on-farm biosecurity: the role of veterinary epidemiology. Engineering, 6(1), 20-25.

G. S. Silva, V. B. Leotti, S. M. Castro, A. A. Medeiros, A. P. Silva, D. C. Linhares, L. G. Corbellini (2019). Assessment of biosecurity practices and development of a scoring system in swine farms using item response theory. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 167, 128-136.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-18

How to Cite

Dubina, D., & Martyniuk, O. (2025). Assessment of biosecurity practices and adaptation of the evaluation system at mink farms using item response theory. One Health Journal, 3(II), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2025-II-03

Issue

Section

Emergent diseases, biosafety and One Health