POSITIVE WELFARE INDICATORS IN DAIRY ANIMALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2023-II-06Keywords:
positive welfare, animal emotions, animal behaviour, dairy cattle, cow comfortAbstract
The concept of "positive welfare" arose in response to the heavy focus on negative aspects when assessing the overall welfare of animals. Although one of the main components of welfare is the emotional status. The aim of this paper is to study and describe the existing, promising, reliable and feasible indicators of the positive welfare of dairy cows on farms. We conducted a search and critical analysis of scientific literature, articles, books and welfare assessment protocols in international databases (Web of Science, PubMed and ResearchGate) using the key words "positive «welfare», «indicator», «comfort», «relationship between human and animal», «emotions», «natural behaviour», «pleasure» combined with «cattle» and «cow». For structure, all indicators were divided into 4 groups: feeding, environment, behaviour and position of animal body parts.A number of the most relevant and feasible indicators for assessing positive welfare in dairy cows were identified, namely: access to pasture, lying comfort, synchronization and qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA). Studies of the positions of the ears, tail and vocalization in dairy animals are promising for the further development of tests. Also an important indicator is the level of relations between a human and animal, as this indicator has a significant impact on the animal welfare.
We consider it relevant to conduct a practical study of these parameters directly on the farm with subsequent inclusion in the protocol for assessing the welfare of the dairy herd. We believe that this review will create a platform for research and discussion about the positive welfare of cows in Ukraine.
References
Beaver, A., Weary, D. M. and von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2021) ‘Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle housed in tiestalls compared to less-restrictive housing types: A systematic review’, J. Dairy Sci, 104, pp. 9383-9417. doi.:10.3168/jds.2020-19609.
Bertelsen, M. and Jensen, M. B. (2019) ‘Does dairy calves’ motivation for social play behavior build up over time?’, Anim Behav Sci, 214, pp. 18-24. doi.:10.1016/j.applanim.2019.02.017.
Buller, H., Blokhuis, H., Jensen, P. and Keeling, L. (2018) ‘Towards farm animal welfare and sustainability’, Anim, 8(6), 81. doi.:10.3390/ani8060081.
Dávid-Barrett, T. and Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012) ‘Cooperation, behavioural synchrony and status in social networks’, J Theor Biol, 308, pp. 88-95. doi.:10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.05.007.
De Oliveira, D. and Keeling, L. (2018) ‘Routine activities and emotions: Integrating body language into an affective state framework’, PloS ONE, 13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195674.
Ede, T., Lecorps, B., von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G. and Weary D. M. (2019) ‘Symposium review: Scientific assessment of affective states in dairy cattle’, J Dairy Sci, 102, pp. 10677-10694. doi.:10.3168/jds.2019-16325.
Held, S. and Špinka, M. (2011) ‘Animal Play and AnimalWelfare’, Anim Behav, 81, pp. 891-899. doi.:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.01.007.
Hemsworth, P. H. (2003) ‘Human-animal interactions in livestock production’, Anim Behav Sci, 81, pp. 185-198.
Herskin, M. S., Kristensen, A. M. and Munksgaard, L. (2004) ‘Behavioural responses of dairy cows toward novel stimuli presented in the home environment’, Appl Anim Behav Sci, 89, pp. 27-40. doi.:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.06.006.
Jensen, M. B., Herskin, M. S., Thomsen, P. T., Forkman, B. and Houe, H. (2015) ‘Preferences of lame cows for type of surface and level of social contact in hospital pens’, J Dairy Sci, 98, pp. 4552-4559. doi.:10.3168/jds.2014-9203.
Keeling, L. (2019) ‘Indicators of good welfare. In Encyclopaedia of Animal Behavior’, 2nd ed.; Chun, C. J., Ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, pp. 134-140.
Lange, A., Waiblinger, S., van Hassel, R., Mundry, R., Futschik, A. and Lürzel, S. (2021) ‘Effect of restrain on heifers during gentle human-animal interaction’, Anim Behav Sci, 243. doi.:10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105445.
Laurijs, K. A., Briefer, F. E., Inonge, R. and Webb, L. E. (2021) ‘Vocalizations in farm animals: A step towards positive welfare assessment’, Anim Behav Sci, 236. doi.:10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105264.
Lv, J., Li, J., Wang, C., Zhao, P., Bi, Y., Zhang, X., Yi, R., Li, X. and Bao, J. (2018) ‘Positive or negative emotion induced by feeding success or failure can affect behaviors, heart rate and immunity of suckling calves’, Physiol Behav, 196, pp. 185-189. doi.:10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.09.006.
Manteca, X., Villalba, J.J., Atwood, S.B., Dziba, L., Provenza, F.D.(2008) «Is dietary choice important to animal welfare?» J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 3, pp. 229-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2008.05.005
Mattiello, S., Battini, M., De Rosa, G., Napolitano, F. and Dwyer, C. (2019) ‘How Can We Assess Positive Welfare in Ruminants?’, Anim, 9(10), p. 758. doi:10.3390/ani9100758.
McConnachie, E., Smid, A. M., Thompson, A. J., Weary, D. M., Gaworski, M. A. and Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2018) ‘Cows are highly motivated to access a grooming substrate’, Biol Lett, 14. doi.:10.1098/rsbl.2018.0303.
Meagher, R. K., Beaver, A., Weary, D. M. and Von Kayserlingk, M .A. G. (2019) ‘Invited review: A systematic review of the effects of prolonged cow-calf contact on behavior, welfare and productivity’, J Dairy Sci, 102, pp. 5765-5783. doi:10.3168/jds.2018-16021.
Meen, G. H., Schellenkens, M. A., Slegers, M. H. M., Leenders, N. L. G., van Erp-van der Kooij, E. and Noldus, L. P. J. J. (2015) ‘Sound analysis in dairy cattle vocalisation as a potential welfare monitor’, Comput Electron Agric, 118, pp. 111-115.
Mellor, D.J. (2015) ‘Enhancing animal welfare by creating opportunities for positive affective engagement’, New Z Vet J, 63, pp. 3-8. doi.:10.1080/00480169.2014.926799.
Mellor, D. J. (2017) ‘Operational details of the five domains model and its key applications to the assessment and management of animal welfare’, Anim, 7, p. 60. doi:10.3390/ani7080060.
Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. P. and Paul E. (2010) ‘An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood’, Proc R Soc Biol Sci, 277(1696), pp. 2895-2904. doi.:10.1098/rspb.2010.0303.
Muir, E., Donbavand, J. and Dwyer, C. M. (2019) ‘Salivary oxytocin is associated with ewe-lamb contact but not sucklingin lactating ewes’, In Proceedings of the 53rd Congress of the International Society of Applied Ethology, Bergen, Norway, p. 255.
Napolitano, F., Knierim, U., Grass, F. and De Rosa, G. (2010) ‘Positive indicators of cattle welfare and their applicability to on-farm protocols’, Ital J Anim Sci, 8, pp. 355-365. doi.:10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.355.
Nielsen, L. H., Mogensen, L., Krohn, C., Hindhede, J. and Sørensen, J. T. (1997) ‘Resting and social behaviour of dairy heifers housed in slatted floor pens with different sized bedded lying areas’, Appl Anim Behav Sci, 54, pp. 307-316. doi.:10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01211-7.
Ninomiya, S. (2019) ‘Grooming Device effects on Behaviour andWelfare of Japanese Black Fattening Cattle’, Anim, 9, p. 186. doi:10.3390/ani9040186.
Petkun, H. V., Nedosekov, V. V. (2022) ‘Analysis of direct parameters of cow welfare assessment on dairy farms’, Theoretical Appl Vet Med, 10(2) pp. 914. doi:10.32819/2022.10007.
Proctor, H. (2012) ‘Animal sentience: where are we and where are we heading?’, Anim, 2, pp. 628-639. doi.:10.3390/ani2040628.
Proctor, H.S. and Carder, G. (2014) ‘Can ear postures reliably measure the positive emotional state of cows?’, Anim Behav Sci, 161, pp. 20-27. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2014.09.015.
Rault, J. L. (2019) ‘Be kind to others: Pro-social behaviors and their implication for animal welfare’, Appl Anim Behav Sci, 210, pp. 113-123. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2018.10.015.
Rault, J. L., Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X. and Hemsworth, P. (2020) ‘The Power of a Positive Human - Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare’, Front Vet Sci, 7. doi.:10.3389/fvets.2020.590867.
Reefmann, N., Wechsler, B. and Gygax L. (2009) ‘Behavioural and physiological assessment of positive and negative emotion in sheep’, Anim Behav, 78(3), pp. 651-659.
Reefmann, N., Bütikofer Kaszàs, F., Wechsler, B. and Gygax, L. (2009) ‘Ear and tail postures as indicators of emotional valence in sheep’, Anim Behav Sci, 118, pp. 199-207.
Richmond, S. E., Wemelsfelder, F., de Heredia, I. B., Ruiz, R., Canali, E. and Dwyer, C. M. (2017) ‘Evaluation of Animal-Based Indicators to Be Used in a Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sheep’, Front Vet Sci, 4, pp. 1-13. doi.:10.3389/fvets.2017.00210.
Sandem, A. I., Braastad, B. O. (2005) ‘Effects of cow-calf separation on visible eye white and behaviour in dairy cows - A brief report’, Anim Behav Sci, 95, pp. 233-239.
Sato, S., Sako, S., Maeda, A. (1991) ‘Social licking patterns in cattle (Bos taurus): Influence of environmental and social factors’, Anim Behav Sci, 32, pp. 3-12. doi.:10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80158-3.
Schnaider, M. A., Heidemann, M. S., Silva, A. H. P., Taconeli, C. A. and Molento, C. F. M. (2022) ‘Vocalization and other behaviors as indicators of emotional valence: The case of cow-calf separation and reunion in beef cattle’, J Vet Behav, 49, pp. 28-35. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2021.11.011.
Stˇehulová, I., Lidfors, L. and Špinka, M. (2008) ‘Response of dairy cows and calves to early separation: Effect of calf age and visual and auditory contact after separation’, Anim Behav Sci, 110, pp. 144-165. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.028.
Stoye, S., Porter, M. A. and Stamp Dawkins, M. (2012) ‘Synchronized lying in cattle in relation to time of day’, Livest Sci, 149, pp. 70-73. doi.:10.1016/j.livsci.2012.06.028.
Tucker, C. B., Jensen, M. B., de Passillé, A. M., Hänninen, L. and Rushen, J. (2021) ‘Invited review: Lying time and the welfare of dairy cows’, J Dairy Sci, 104, pp. 20-46. doi.:10.3168/jds.2019-18074.
Tucker, S. (2017) ‘Behaviour of cattle. In The Ethology of Domestic Animals: An Introductory Text’, 3rd ed.; Per Jensen, J., Ed.; CABI: Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK; Boston, MA, USA, pp. 189-198.
Tuomisto, L., Huuskonen, A., Jauhiainen, L. and Mononen, J. (2019) ‘Finishing bulls have more synchronised behavior in pastures than in pens’, Anim Behav Sci, 213, pp. 26-32. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2019.02.007.
United Nations Committee. Proposed Draft Recommendations on Sustainable Agricultural Development for Food Security and Nutrition Including the Role of Livestock (2016) ‘Animal Health and Welfare’: Easton, PA, USA, Article VIII.
Van Eerdenburg Frank, J. C. M., Vázquez-Floresb, S., SaltijeralOaxacac, J. and Evangelia, N. S. (2013) ‘A cow comfort monitoring scheme to increase the milk yield of a dairy farm’; Aland, A. and Banhazi, Th. (eds): Livestock housing: Modern management to ensure optimal health and welfare of farm animals’, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 55-74.
Welfare Quality Consortium (2008) ‘Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Cattle» Welfare Quality Consortium’: Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Wenker, L. M., van Reenen, C. G., Bokkers, E. A. M., McCrea, K., de Oliveira, D., Sørheim, K., Cao, Y., Bruckmaier, R. M., Gross, J. J. and Gort, G. (2022) ‘Comparing gradual debonding strategies after prolonged cow-calf contact: Stress responses, performance, and health of dairy cow and calf’, Anim Behav Sci, 253. doi.:10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105694.
Westerath, H. S., Gygax, L. and Hillmann, E. (2014) ‘Are special feed and being brushed judged as positive by the calves?’, Appl Anim Behav Sci, 156, pp. 12-21. doi.:10.1016/j.applanim.2014.04.003.
Winckler, C., Brinkmann, J. and Glatz, J. (2007) ‘Long-term consistency of selected animal-related welfare parameters in dairy farms’, Anim Welf, 16, pp. 197-199.
