DETERMINATION OF THE OPTIMAL IMMUNOSTIMULATORY DOSE OF ETR FOR CHICKENS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2024-I-02

Keywords:

drone brood extract, immunostimulant, chickens, Newcastle disease, optimal dose

Abstract

The immunocompetent system of chickens, especially day-old chicks, is not yet sufficiently formed and, accordingly, it cannot fully function and immunodeficiency conditions may occur. The use of immunostimulants is promising for the treatment of immunodeficiency states, as they increase the immune status of the body, strengthen natural resistance and reduce the loss of livestock, especially young animals. In addition, the use of immunostimulants makes it possible to strengthen the immune response when vaccinating livestock. The ETR immunostimulator developed by us contains many essential amino acids, enzymes, fat- and water-soluble vitamins and trace elements. In previous studies, we prepared the ETR preparation using a special method and established its immunostimulating effect during the vaccination of chickens against Newcastle disease. In this work, the optimal immunostimulating dose of drone brood extract (ETR) was determined when vaccinating chickens against Newcastle disease. In order to determine the optimal dose of ETP immunostimulator for the body of chickens, the immune status was calculated based on serological, biochemical and immunomorphological indicators. For the study, 5 groups of 14-day- old Leghorn chickens, 10 heads in each group, were formed, which were injected intranasally with a live vaccine virus from the La Sota strain against Newcastle disease. The first group was a control, its chickens were only vaccinated, the second group of chickens was injected enterally with ETR in a dose of 0,1 cm3, the third – 0,3 , the fourth – 0,5 , the fifth – 0,7 , the sixth – 0,9 . According to the results of serological studies, a fairly effective immunostimulating dose for chickens is a dose of 0,9 , but doses of 0,5 and 0,7 are also immunostimulating, since the difference between the results of the fourth, fifth and sixth groups is insignificant, and the titer of antihemagglutinins respectively, it was 7,58±0,03 log2 in the fourth group, 7,60±0,06 log2 in the fifth group, and 7,64±0,04 log2 in the sixth group. According to the results of biochemical studies, it was found that the best levels of IgG, Ig M and Ig A were in chickens of group 6, which received an immunostimulant in a dose of 0,9 and were, respectively, 9,12±0,013 mg/, 1,60±0,04 mg/ and 0,65±0,012 mg/ . But doses of 0,5 and 0,7 are also immunostimulating, since the difference in the indicators of the 4-th, 5-th and 6th groups was insignificant. According to the results of immunomorphological studies, the indices of lymphoid organs increased with an increase in the dose of the immunostimulator. A dose of 0,5 in chicks of the 4-th group should be considered optimal, because further increases in the dose were less effective, although a small increase in these parameters was observed in the chicks of the 5-th and 6-th groups.

References

Burdeinyi, R., Hrinchenko, D., Severyn, R., & Hontar, A. (2023). Vyvchennia imunostymuliuiuchoi dii ekstraktu trutnevoho rozplodu (ETR) pry shcheplenni kurchat proty niukaslskoi khvoroby. One Health Journal; 1(I):53–56. https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2023-I-06.

Ahmad. S., Graça. M., Fratini. F., Altaye. S.and Li. J. (2020) New insights into the biological and pharmaceutical properties of royal jelly. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 21(2):1-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020382

Bagheri S, Mitra T, Paudel S, Abdelhamid MK, Könnyü S, Wijewardana V, Kangethe RT, Cattoli G, Lyrakis M, Hess C, Hess M & Liebhart D. (2023) Aerosol vaccination of chicken pullets with irradiated avian pathogenic Escherichia coli induces a local immunostimulatory effect. Front Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1185232.

Bazekin. G., Skovorodin. E., Dolinin. I., Gatiyatullin. I., Chudov. I. and Ezhkova. A. (2021). The Effect of new immunostimulants of tissue and plant origin on the morphological characteristics of the immune system’s central organs and the dynamics of serum immunoglobulins. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci.; 9(11):1800-1809. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.11.1800.1809

Bhadouriya S, Sharma BK, Kakker NK, Chhabra R. (2019). Toll like receptors and cytokines as immunostimulatory adjuvants in poultry vaccines: current status and future trends. World’s Poultry Science Journal; 75(3):417-428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933919000242.

Hasted Teri-Lyn, Sharif Shayan, Boerlin Patrick & Diarra Moussa Sory. (2021) Immunostimulatory Potential of Fruits and Their Extracts in Poultry.Frontiers in Immunology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.641696.

Talazadeh, F., Mayahi, M., & Fathi, M. (2022). Evaluation of immunostimulatory effects of a commercial herbal extract on avian influenza subtype H9N2 and Newcastle disease vaccination in chickens. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society; 73(2):4023–4030. https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.26157.

Lin SY, Yao BY, Hu CMJ, Chen HW. (2020). Induction of Robust Immune Responses by CpG-ODN-Loaded Hollow Polymeric Nanoparticles for Antiviral and Vaccine Applications in Chickens. Int J Nanomedicine; 15:3303-3318. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S241492.

Ali, M.F., Abdel Hafez, M.S. & Mohamed, M.A. (2019). The ameliorating effect of some immune-stimulants on bursal and tracheal lesions of broiler chickens challenged with ND virus. JoBAZ; 80:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-019-0073-7.

Published

2024-03-06

How to Cite

Bourdeiniy, R. A., Hrinchenko, D. M., Severyn, R. V., Salamashenko, A. S., & Domashych, K. A. (2024). DETERMINATION OF THE OPTIMAL IMMUNOSTIMULATORY DOSE OF ETR FOR CHICKENS. One Health Journal, 2(I), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2024-I-02

Issue

Section

Health and welfare, means of protection of animals