Microbial biofilms: molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and methods for their investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2026-IV-02Keywords:
biofilms, antibiotic resistance, antibiotic tolerance, extracellular matrix, persister cells, MBEC, MBC-B, biofilm research methodsAbstract
By performing a literature review, to summarize current evidence on the molecular mechanisms underlying biofilm-associated resistance to antibacterial agents and to analyze laboratory approaches used for biofilm cultivation, visualization, and antimicrobial susceptibility assessment. An analytical review of Ukrainian and international publications on biofilms, antimicrobial resistance, and biofilm research methods was performed. Sources were identified through open scientific databases and library resources, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Scopus, and domestic library collections. The search strategy included terms related to biofilms, bacterial biofilms, antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic tolerance, molecular resistance mechanisms, biofilm research methods, and biofilm-associated infections. The review demonstrates that biofilm resistance is a multifactorial phenomenon generated by the combined action of several protective layers. A central role belongs to the extracellular matrix, which contains exopolysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and extracellular DNA and acts as both a structural scaffold and a diffusion barrier. Biofilm tolerance is further reinforced by marked spatial and metabolic heterogeneity, limited antibiotic penetration into deeper layers, the emergence of dormant persister cells, reduced growth activity, efflux-mediated drug removal, enzymatic antibiotic inactivation, target modification, and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Together, these factors markedly decrease the susceptibility of biofilm-embedded microorganisms compared with planktonic cells. The paper also systematizes the main laboratory models used to study biofilms. Static systems, including tube assays, Congo Red Agar, and microtiter plate methods, are suitable for primary screening and quantitative biomass assessment, but only partially reproduce the gradients and hydrodynamic conditions typical of natural and clinical environments. Dynamic models, such as flow-cell systems, drip-flow reactors, rotating disk reactors, and CDC biofilm reactors, allow mature biofilms to be formed under controlled flow and shear conditions, although they require more complex instrumentation. Special attention is given to methods for testing biofilm susceptibility, including CFU counting, MBEC-based approaches, MBC-B determination, and metabolic viability assays, which provide a more informative comparison of antibiotic activity against planktonic and biofilm populations. Biofilm-associated resistance cannot be attributed to a single determinant, since it arises from the interaction between matrix-mediated protection, physiological heterogeneity, adaptive phenotypic states, and genetic resistance mechanisms. Existing in vitro models have significantly improved the study of biofilm biology and antimicrobial susceptibility, yet none is universally applicable to all research and clinical tasks. Further development of standardized and reproducible methods that retain ecological and clinical relevance is essential for better diagnostics and for designing more effective strategies against biofilm-associated infections.
References
Zhao A., Sun J., Liu Y. (2023). Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology; 13, 1137947. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1137947.
Vestby L. K., Grønseth T., Simm R., Nesse L. L. (2020). Bacterial biofilm and its role in the pathogenesis of disease. Antibiotics; 9(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9020059.
Koshova O. Yu., Shapovalova O. V., Filimonova N. I., Tishchenko I. Yu., Dubinina N. V. (2025). Bioplivky v systemakh vodopostachannya: aktualʹni problemy dezinfektsiyi ta kontrolyu mikrobnoho zahryaznennya [Biofilms in water supply systems: actual problems of disinfection and microbial contamination control]. In Current trends in scientific research development. Proceedings of the 11th International scientific and practical conference (pp. 104-113); BoScience Publisher. sci-conf.com.ua
Schulze A., Mitterer F., Pombo J. P., Schild S. (2021). Biofilms by bacterial human pathogens: Clinical relevance-development, composition and regulation -therapeutical strategies. Microbial Cell; 8(2), 28–56. https://doi.org/10.15698/mic2021.02.741
Singh H., Gahane A., Singh V., Ghosh S., Thakur A. (2021). Antibiofilm activity of Fmoc-phenylalanine against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial biofilms. The Journal of Antibiotics; 74(6), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-021-00409-2.
Thi M. T. T., Wibowo D., Rehm B. H. (2020). Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences; 21(22), 8671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228671.
Oluyombo O., Penfold C. N., Diggle S. P. (2019). Competition in biofilms between cystic fibrosis isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is shaped by R-pyocins. mBio; 10(1), Article e01828-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01828-18.
Stewart P. S., Bjarnsholt T. (2020). Risk factors for chronic biofilm-related infection associated with implanted medical devices. Clinical Microbiology and Infection; 26(8), 1034–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.027.
Caldara M., Belgiovine C., Secchi E., Rusconi R. (2022). Environmental, microbiological, and immunological features of bacterial biofilms associated with implanted medical devices. Clinical Microbiology Reviews; 35(2), Article e00221-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00221-20.
Grooters K. E., Ku J. C., Richter D. M., Krinock M. J., Minor A., Li P., Kim A., Sawyer R., Li Y. (2024). Strategies for combating antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology; 14, 1352273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1352273.
Mishra A., Aggarwal A., Khan F. (2024). Medical device-associated infections caused by biofilm-forming microbial pathogens and controlling strategies. Antibiotics; 13(7), 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13070623.
Muhammad M. H., Idris A. L., Fan X., Guo Y., Yu Y., Jin X., Qiu J., Guan X., Huang T. (2020). Beyond risk: Bacterial biofilms and their regulating approaches. Frontiers in Microbiology; 11, 928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00928.
Campoccia D., Montanaro L., Arciola C. R. (2021). Extracellular DNA (eDNA). A major ubiquitous element of the bacterial biofilm architecture. International Journal of Molecular Sciences; 22(16), 9100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22169100.
Panlilio H., Rice C. V. (2021). The role of extracellular DNA in the formation, architecture, stability, and treatment of bacterial biofilms. Biotechnology and Bioengineering; 118(6), 2129–2141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27760.
Priya P. S., Boopathi S., Murugan R., Haridevamuthu B., Arshad A., Arockiaraj J. (2023). Quorum sensing signals: Aquaculture risk factor. Reviews in Aquaculture; 15(4), 1294–1310. https://doi:10.1111/raq.12774.
Singh B. P., Ghosh S., Chauhan A. (2021). Development, dynamics and control of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial biofilms: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters; 19(3), 1983–1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01169-5.
Grari O., Ezrari S., Yandouzi I., Benaissa E., Lahlou Y. B., Lahmer M., Saddari A., Elouennass M., Maleb, A. (2025). A comprehensive review on biofilm-associated infections: Mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, and innovative therapeutic strategies. The Microbe; 8, 100436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microb.2025.100436.
Ciofu O., Moser C., Jensen P. Ø., Høiby N. (2022). Tolerance and resistance of microbial biofilms. Nature Reviews Microbiology; 20(10), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00682-4.
Quan K., Hou J., Zhang Z., Ren Y., Peterson B. W., Flemming H. C., Mayer C., Busscher H. J., van der Mei H. C. (2022). Water in bacterial biofilms: Pores and channels, storage and transport functions. Critical Reviews in Microbiology; 48(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2021.1962802.
Sajna K. V., Sharma S., Nadda A. K. (Eds.). (2021). Microbial exopolysaccharides: An introduction. In Microbial Exopolysaccharides as Novel and Significant Biomaterials; (pp. 1–18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75289-7.
Mistrologics. (2018, February 18). Biofilm formation causes microbial and chronic infections. Retrieved March 9, 2026, from https://www.sciencesg.com/mistrologics/biofilm-formation-microbial-organisms/
Patil M. (2025). Biofilm: A life for microorganisms with basic biofilm principles. In A. Kumar and A. Upadhyay (Eds.), Salmonella Biofilms: Formation, Resistance, and Therapeutics; (Chap. 1, pp. 1–33). Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781837677047-00001.
Lebeloane M. M., Famuyide I. M., Dzoyem J. P., Adeyemo R. O., Makhubu F. N., Elgorashi E. E., Kgosana K. G., McGaw L. J. (2024). Influence of selected plant extracts on bacterial motility, aggregation, hydrophobicity, exopolysaccharide production and quorum sensing during biofilm formation of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. South African Journal of Botany; 167, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2024.02.022.
Singh S., Datta S., Narayanan K. B., Rajnish K. N. (2021). Bacterial exo-polysaccharides in biofilms: Role in antimicrobial resistance and treatments. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; 19(1), Article 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00242-y.
Kreve S., Dos Reis A. C. D. (2021). Bacterial adhesion to biomaterials: What regulates this attachment? A review. The Japanese Dental Science Review; 57, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.05.003.
Wang J., Li G., Yin H., An T. (2020). Bacterial response mechanism during biofilm growth on different metal material substrates: EPS characteristics, oxidative stress and molecular regulatory network analysis. Environmental Research; 185, Article 109451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109451.
Verma S., Kuila A., Jacob S. (2023). Role of biofilms in waste water treatment. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology; 195(9), 5618–5642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-022-04163-5.
Singh A., Amod A., Pandey P., Bose P., Pingali M. S., Shivalkar S., Varadwaj P. K., Sahoo A. K., Samanta S. K. (2022). Bacterial biofilm infections, their resistance to antibiotics therapy and current treatment strategies. Biomedical Materials; 17(2), Article 022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac50f6.
Galdiero E., de Alteriis E., De Natale A., D’Alterio A., Siciliano A., Guida M., Lombardi L., Falanga A., Galdiero S. (2020). Eradication of Candida albicans persister cell biofilm by the membranotropic peptide gH625. Scientific Reports; 10, Article 5780. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62746-w.
Grande R., Puca V., Muraro R. (2020). Antibiotic resistance and bacterial biofilm. Expert opinion on therapeutic patents, 30(12), 897–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2020.1830060.
Shree P., Singh C. K., Sodhi K. K., Surya J. N., Singh D. K. (2023). Biofilms: Understanding the structure and contribution towards bacterial resistance in antibiotics. Medicine in Microecology; 16, Article 100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2023.100084.
Moser C., Jensen P. Ø., Thomsen K., Kolpen M., Rybtke M., Lauland A. S., Trøstrup H., Tolker-Nielsen T. (2021). Immune responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infections. Frontiers in Immunology; 12, Article 625597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.625597.
Cangui-Panchi S. P., Ñacato-Toapanta A. L., Enríquez-Martínez L. J., Salinas-Delgado G. A., Reyes J., Garzon-Chavez D., Machado A. (2023). Battle royale: Immune response on biofilms - Host-pathogen interactions. Current Research in Immunology; 4, Article 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crimmu.2023.100057.
Coenye T., Bové M., Bjarnsholt T. (2022). Biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility through an experimental evolutionary lens. NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes; 8(1), Article 82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-022-00346-4.
Stewart P. S., Williamson K. S., Boegli L., Hamerly T., White B., Scott L., Hu X., Mumey B. M., Franklin M. J., Bothner B., Vital-Lopez F. G., Wallqvist A., James G. A. (2022). Search for a shared genetic or biochemical basis for biofilm tolerance to antibiotics across bacterial species. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 66(4), Article e00021-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00021-22.
Koshova O., Filimonova N., Mozghova L., Tishchenko I. (2024). Bacterial plasmids: The role in the development of resistance to antimicrobial compounds. ScienceRise: Biological Science; 2(39), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2024.311822.
Uruén C., Chopo-Escuin G., Tommassen J., Mainar-Jaime R. C., Arenas J. (2020). Biofilms as promoters of bacterial antibiotic resistance and tolerance. Antibiotics; 10(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010003.
Cruz A., Condinho M., Carvalho B., Arraiano C. M., Pobre V., Pinto S. N. (2021). The two weapons against bacterial biofilms: Detection and treatment. Antibiotics; 10(12), Article 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121482.
Pinto R. M., Soares F. A., Reis S., Nunes C., Van Dijck P. (2020). Innovative strategies toward the disassembly of the EPS matrix in bacterial biofilms. Frontiers in Microbiology; 11, Article 952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00952.
Kirketerp-Møller K., Stewart P. S., Bjarnsholt T. (2020). The zone model: A conceptual model for understanding the microenvironment of chronic wound infection. Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 28(5), 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12841.
Flemming H. C., Wingender J., Szewzyk U., Steinberg P., Rice S. A., Kjelleberg S. (2016). Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nature reviews. Microbiology, 14(9), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
Upadhyay A., Jaiswal N., Kumar A. (2025). Biofilm battle: New transformative tactics to tackle the bacterial biofilm infections. Microbial Pathogenesis; 199, Article 107277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107277.
Ciofu O., Tolker-Nielsen T. (2023). Tolerance and resistance of microbial biofilms to antimicrobial agents. Microbiology Spectrum; 11(1), Article e02124-22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00913.
Liu S., Lu H., Zhang S., Shi Y., Chen Q. (2022). Phages against pathogenic bacterial biofilms and biofilm-based infections: A review. Pharmaceutics; 14(2), Article 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020427.
Liu D., Huang Q., Gu W., Zeng X. A. (2022). A review of bacterial biofilm control by physical strategies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition; 62(13), 3453–3470. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1865872.
Bankar,D. N., Thakre R., Mishra V., Tiwade, Y. (2024). The battle against biofilms: understanding the impact on medical devices and patient health. Reviews and Research in Medical Microbiology, 36(2), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRM.0000000000000404.
da Silva R. A., Afonina I., Kline K. A. (2021). Eradicating biofilm infections: An update on current and prospective approaches. Current Opinion in Microbiology; 63, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2021.07.001.
Pires D. P., Meneses L., Brandão A. C., Azeredo J. (2022). An overview of the current state of phage therapy for the treatment of biofilm-related infections. Current Opinion in Virology; 53, Article 101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2022.101209.
Su Y., Yrastorza J. T., Matis M., Cusick J., Zhao S., Wang G., Xie J. (2022). Biofilms: Formation, research models, potential targets, and methods for prevention and treatment. Advanced Science; 9(29), Article e2203291. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202203291.
Han A., Lee S. Y. (2023). An overview of various methods for in vitro biofilm formation: A review. Food Science and Biotechnology; 32(12), 1617–1629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-023-01425-8.
Christensen G. D., Simpson W. A., Bisno A. L., Beachey E. H. (1982). Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infection and Immunity; 37(1), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.37.1.318-326.1982.
Freeman J., Falkiner F. R., Keane C. T. (1989). New method for detecting slime production by coagulase-negative staphylococci. Journal of Clinical Pathology; 42(8), 872–874. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.42.8.872.
Christensen G. D., Simpson W. A., Younger J. J., Baddour L. M., Barrett F. F., Melton D. M., Beachey E. H. (1985). Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: A quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. Journal of Clinical Microbiology; 22(6), 996–1006. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.22.6.996-1006.1985.
Stepanovic S., Vukovic D., Dakic I., Savic B., Svabic-Vlahovic M. (2000). A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. Journal of Microbiological Methods; 40(2), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00122-6.
Ceri H., Olson M., Morck D., Storey D., Read R., Buret A., Olson, B. (2001). The MBEC Assay System: Multiple equivalent biofilms for antibiotic and biocide susceptibility testing. Methods in Enzymology; 337, 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(01)37026-x.
Ceri H., Olson M. E., Stremick C., Read R. R., Morck D., Buret A. (1999). The Calgary Biofilm Device: New technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology; 37(6), 1771–1776. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.37.6.1771-1776.1999.
Harrison J. J., Stremick C. A., Turner R. J., Allan N. D., Olson M. E., Ceri H. (2010). Microtiter susceptibility testing of microbes growing on peg lids: a miniaturized biofilm model for high-throughput screening. Nature protocols, 5(7), 1236–1254. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.71
Kher L., Santoro D. (2023). Biofilm models: Different ways of biofilm characterization and drug discovery. Current Protocols; 3(9), Article e894. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpz1.894.
Mah T. F. (2014). Establishing the minimal bactericidal concentration of an antimicrobial agent for planktonic cells (MBC-P) and biofilm cells (MBC-B). Journal of Visualized Experiments; (83), Article e50854. https://doi.org/10.3791/50854.
Wannigama D. L., Hurst C., Pearson L., Saethang T., Singkham-In U., Luk-In S., Storer R. J., Chatsuwan T. (2019). Simple fluorometric-based assay of antibiotic effectiveness for Acinetobacter baumannii biofilms. Scientific Reports; 9(1), Article 6300. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42353-0.
Wannigama D. L., Hurst C., Hongsing P., Pearson L., Saethang T., Chantaravisoot N., Singkham-In U., Luk-In S., Storer R. J., Chatsuwan T. (2020). A rapid and simple method for routine determination of antibiotic sensitivity to biofilm populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials; 19(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-020-00350-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 One Health Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

