МОНІТОРИНГ БРУЦЕЛЬОЗУ СІЛЬСЬКОГОСПОДАРСЬКИХ ТВАРИН ТА ДИКОЇ ФАУНИ НА ТЕРИТОРІЇ УКРАЇНИ ЗА ПЕРІОД 2017–2021 РР.

G. B. Alekseeva; O. L. Kravtsova; O. D. Polishchuk; G. M. Metolapova; V. L. Heraymovich

doi:10.31073/onehealthjournal2024-I-06

Authors

G. B. Alekseeva State Research Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics and Veterinary-Sanitary Expertise, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-2083
O. L. Kravtsova State Research Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics and Veterinary-Sanitary Expertise, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2119-7749
O. D. Polishchuk State Research Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics and Veterinary-Sanitary Expertise, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4415-2773
G. M. Metolapova State Research Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics and Veterinary-Sanitary Expertise, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-9300
V. L. Heraymovich National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine (NUBIP), Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4721-5100

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2024-I-06

Keywords:

brucellosis, epidemiology, brucellosis carriers, diagnosis

Abstract

According to the WHO, about 500,000 new cases of brucellosis in humans are registered annually in the world. The territory of Ukraine is free from brucellosis of agricultural and domestic animals. Since 1967, brucellosis has not been registered among sheep, for the last 25 years - among cattle. Individual cases of brucellosis have been confirmed among humans in the private sector through direct contact with imported animals. However, currently in Ukraine, under the influence of modern socio-economic factors, migration processes, the danger of cross-border introduction of infection, as well as the discovery of new species of Brucella, the study of their natural reservoirs, the formation of foci of the disease in territories previously free of brucellosis, brucellosis remains important and an actual problem. As antibodies to the causative agent of brucellosis were detected in 20 samples of blood serum collected from wild animals in 2017–2021, the problem of animal brucellosis requires in-depth research and continued monitoring of the spread of this infection among susceptible animal

References

Akhvlediani, T., Bautista, C. T., Garuchava, N., Sanodze, L., Kokaia, N., Malania, L., & Nikolich, M. P. (2017). Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia. PloS one; 12(1). doi.:10.1371/journal.pone.0170376.

Alhaji N.B., Wungak YY.S., Bertu W.J. (2016). Serological survey of bovine brucellosis in Fulani nomadic cattle breeds (Bos indicus) of North-central Nigeria: Potential risk factors and zoonotic implications; 28−35 Acta Trop:53. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.10.003.

Dahucek S. Al, Neubauer H., Hensel A.et al. (2007). Epidemiology of Human Brucellosis. Germany, 1962-2005. Emerg. Infect. Dis; 13(12):185-189. doi:10.3201/eid1312.070527.

Erdenebaatar J, Bayarsaikhan B, Watarai M, et al. (2003). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 10: 710–714. doi:10.1128/CDLI.10.4.710-714.2003

Godfroid J, Saegerman C, Wellemans V, et al. (2002). How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when specific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing. Vet Microbiol; 90: 461–477. doi:10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00230-4

Erdenebaatar J., Bayarsaikhan B., Watarai M., et al. (2003). Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay To Differentiate the Antibody Responses of Animals Infected with Brucella Species from Those of Animals Infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology; 10(4): 45–57. doi.:10.1128/CDLI.10.4.710-714.2003

Nielsen K., Gall D., Bermudek R., Renteria T., et al. (2002). Field trial of the brucellosis fluorescence polarization assay. J Immunoassay Immunochem; 23: 307-316. doi:10.1081/IAS- 120013030.

Nielsen K, Smith P, Widdison J, et al. (2004), Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Vet Microbiol; 100: 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.12.010

Nielsen K, Smith P, Yu W, et al. (2006). Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella spp.and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 109: 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.07.025

Olsen S.C., Garin-Bastuji B., Blasco J.M., et al. (2012). Swine Brucellosis. In: Diseases ofSwine, Zimmerman J.J., Karriker A.L., Ramirez A., Schwartz K.J. & Stevenson G.W. eds, 10: 697–708; th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, USA. doi:10.2147/VMRR.S91360

Pyskun A., Polishchuk О., Aliekseieva H. et al. (2019) Presence of antibodies against Brucella spp. in serum samples from wild boars in Ukraine. Porcine Research; 9(1): 26–33. Doi: 10.33245/2310-4902-2021-168-2-49-56

World Organization for Animal Health (OIE): 2022, Bovine brucellosis, chapter 3.1.4. Brucellosis (Infection with Brucella abortus, B. melitensis and B. suis).

Vorozhbyt O.B., Hrytsko R.Iu., Lysheniuk S.A. (2012) Osoblyvosti perebihu brutselozu na suchasnomu etapi. Eksperymentalna ta klinichna fiziolohiia i biokhimiia. 2:93-97.

Vynohrad N. O., Poliak M. A. (2011) Epidemiolohiia brutselozu na suchasnomu etapi. Problemy viiskovoi okhorony zdorovia; 29:92-96. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/prvozd_2011_29_

Khurana SK, Sehrawat A, Tiwari R, Prasad M, Gulati B, Shabbir MZ, Chhabra R, Karthik K, Patel SK, Pathak M, Iqbal Yatoo M, Gupta VK, Dhama K, Sah R, Chaicumpa W. (2021) Bovine brucellosis - a comprehensive review. Vet Q. Jan 1; 41(1):61-88. doi:10.1080/01652176.2020.1868616. PMID: 33353489; PMCID: PMC7833053.

Enström S, Nthiwa D, Bett B, Karlsson A, Alonso S, Lindahl JF. (2017) Brucella seroprevalence in cattle near a wildlife reserve in Kenya. BMC Res Notes; Nov 25; 10(1):615. doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2941-x. PMID: 29178956; PMCID: PMC5702115.

Vynohrad N. O., Poliak M. A. (2010). Epidemiolohiia brutselozu na suchasnomu etapi. Kliniko-epidemiolohichni aspekty borotby ta profilaktyka infektsiinykh i neinfektsiinykh khvorob sered ditei i doroslykh: mizhnarod. nauk.-prakt. konf.; Kharkiv; 288-289.

Derzhavna ustanova “Dnipropetrovskyi oblasnyi tsentr kontroliu ta profilaktyky khvorob Ministerstva okhorony zdorov`ia Ukrainy”; Pidstupnyi ta nebezpechnyi brutseloz.; dolc.dp.ua http://www.dolc.dp.ua › wpress (data zvernennia 01.09.2014)

Stehnii B.T., Gerilovych A.P., Bisiuk I.Iu. (2014) Epizootolohichnyi monitorynh, prohnozuvannia, reahuvannia pry transmisyvnykh khvorobakh tvaryn i naukovyi suprovid problemy v Ukraini. Veterynarna medytsyna; 98:5–11. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vetmed_2014_98_3

Nastanova po diahnostytsi brutselozu tvaryn: zatv. nakazom Derzhavnoho departamentu veterynarnoi medytsyny Minahropromu Ukrainy 10 liutoho 1998 r. No. 15–14/55.

MONITORING OF BRUCELLOSIS IN AGRICULTURAL ANIMALS AND WILD FAUNA IN THE TERRITORY OF UKRAINE IN 2017–2021

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Language

Agreement on Copyright Assignation:

Information

Current Issue