Experience in controlling classical swine fever using booster vaccination

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2025-V-08

Keywords:

classical swine fever, case investigation, diagnosis, vaccines

Abstract

The article presents experimental scientific data of epidemiological investigation of classical swine fever (CSF) among domestic pigs in the private sector and the use of booster doses of CSF vaccines on piglets. The aim of the study was to conduct an epidemiological study of the incidence of CSF among domestic pigs in the private sector. To confirm the efficacy of booster (tenfold) doses of ASV and LK-M vaccines against classical swine fever using clinical, pathological, anatomical and laboratory methods for diagnosing CSF disease and evaluating the effectiveness of CSF disease in piglets.
The experiments were conducted in the CSF chamber in the village of Khotiv, Kyiv-Svyatoshynskyi district of Kyiv, where 20 heads of unvaccinated piglets under two months of age weighing 10-12 kg, 1 piglet aged 7-8 months, 1 boar and 1 sow aged 1.5 years were kept. For the diagnostic purpose of the case of classical swine fever, in accordance with generally accepted methods, the hematological method with counting the number of blood leukocytes and the immunoperoxidase test for detection of antigens and antibodies to the swine fever virus were used. Piglets were vaccinated with dry lapinized ASV viral vaccine, and animals of the second group were vaccinated with LK-M viral vaccine.
Based on the results of the studies, it can be argued that in the outbreak of classical swine fever, the LK-M viral vaccine was more effective, which, unlike ASV, is able to stop the infectious process. In our opinion, this phenomenon is due to the fact that the live attenuated virus of the vaccine against classical swine fever in the amount of 100,000 ImD50 (tenfold dose of vaccination with the LK-M vaccine) probably exceeded the amount of field virus in the piglet's body and contributes to a more pronounced reaction of the immune system (formation of specific antibodies) and further neutralization of field virus and recovery of animals, whereas in the vaccine against classical swine fever the amount of live attenuated virus, even in a tenfold dose, was insufficient to stop the development of classical swine fever infection.
The analysis of the epizootic investigation of the case of classical swine fever in the private sector showed that the pathogen was introduced with food waste brought from canteens that had not been heat treated before feeding.
In the outbreak of classical swine fever, the LK-M virus vaccine proved to be more effective in stopping the infectious process due to the presence of a large amount of live attenuated vaccine virus in a tenfold dose, which exceeded the amount of field virus in the piglet's body and contributed to a more pronounced immunological response from the piglet's body and further neutralization of field virus and their recovery compared to the ASV vaccine.
In our opinion, in certain cases (e.g., preservation of breeds or breeding pigs), one of the promising measures in the event of the occurrence and elimination of a CSF outbreak is the use of tenfold doses of LK-M vaccine with the permission of the State Veterinary Service of Ukraine.

References

Terpstra C., Wensvoort, G. (1988). The protective value of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody titres in swine fever. Veterinary Microbiology, 16(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(88)90036-3

Postel A., Austermann-Busch S., Petrov A., Moennig V., Becher, P. (2018). Epidemiology, diagnosis and control of classical swine fever: Recent developments and future challenges. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 65(Suppl 1), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12676

Luo Y., Li S., Sun Y., Qiu H.-J. (2014). Classical swine fever in China: A minireview. Veterinary Microbiology, 172(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.04.004

Rossi S., Staubach C., Blome S., Guberti V., Thulke H.-H., Vos A., Koenen F., Le Potier M. F. (2015). Controlling CSFV in European wild boar using oral vaccination: A review. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 1141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01141

Blome S., Staubach C., Henke J., Carlson J., Beer, M. (2017). Classical swine fever—An updated review. Viruses, 9(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9040086

Jenckel M., Blome S., Beer M., Hoper D. (2017). Quasispecies composition and diversity do not reveal any predictors for chronic classical swine fever virus infection. Archives of Virology, 162(3), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-016-3161-8

Shykov O. T., Sytiuk M. P., Bilokon V. I., Panchenko O. O., Sobko Yu. A., Obrazhei A. F. (2002). Kompleksne vyvchennia protychumnoi vaktsyny "LK-M" [Comprehensive study of the anti-plague vaccine "LK-M"]. Veterynarna biotekhnolohiia [Veterinary Biotechnology], 2, 263–268. [in Ukrainian]

Saunders G. C. (1977). Development and evaluation of an enzyme-labeled antibody test for the rapid detection of hog cholera antibodies. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 38(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.1977.38.01.21

Xia H., Harimoorthy R., Vijayaraghavan B., Blome S., Widen F., Beer M., Belak S., Liu L. (2015). Differentiation of Classical Swine Fever Virus Infection from CP7_E2alf marker vaccination by a multiplex microsphere immunoassay. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 22(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00271-14

Meyer D., Fritsche S., Luo Y., Engemann C., Blome S., Beyerbach M., Chang C. Y., Qiu H. J., Becher P., Postel A. (2017). The double-antigen ELISA concept for early detection of Erns-specific classical swine fever virus antibodies and application as an accompanying test for differentiation of infected from marker-vaccinated animals. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 64(6), 2013–2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12611

Liu S. T., Li S. N., Wang D. C., Chang S. F., Chiang S. C., Ho W. C., Chang Y. S., Lai S. S. (1991). Rapid detection of hog cholera virus in tissues by the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Virological Methods, 35(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0934(91)90138-P

Kit M., Gerilovych A. (2021). Development of DNA detection of African swine fever virus by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. In Proceedings of the 2021 International BioThreat Reduction Symposium: Abstract Book (Vol. 2, p. 63). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Astghik-Pepoyan/publication/.

Sytiuk M. P., Shykov, O. T. (2002). Vyvchennia pokaznykiv kilkosti leikotsytiv krovi u pidsvynkiv, shcheplenykh proty klasychnoi chumy svynei lapinizovanoiu viralvaktsynoiu ASV [Study of blood leukocyte counts in piglets vaccinated against classical swine fever with the lapinized ASV vaccine]. Scientific Visnyk LDAVM imeni S.Z. Gzhytskoho – Scientific Messenger of Gzhytskyi LDAVM, 4(1), 144–147. [in Ukrainian]

Dales S. (1973). Early events in cell-animal virus interactions. Bacteriological Reviews, 37(2), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1128/br.37.2.103-135.1973

Sobko Yu. A. (1999). Specific prevention of classical swine fever. Veterynarna medytsyna Ukrainy [Veterinary Medicine of Ukraine], 7, 20–21. [in Ukrainian]

Pryskoka V. A., Pavlenko M. S. (1995). Diagnostics and immunoprofilaktyka klasychnoi chumy svynei [Diagnostics and immunoprophylaxis of classical swine fever] (p. 40). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian]

Kolomyitsev A. A., Zhesterev V. I., Vishniakov I. F. (1995). Epizootiia klassicheskoi chumy svinei na svinokomplekse "Industrialnyi" Krasnodarskogo kraia i rol virusvaktsiny iz shtamma LK-K v eio lokalizatsii [Epizootic of classical swine fever at the Industrial pig farm in Krasnodar Krai and the role of the LK-K strain vaccine in its localization]. In Classical swine fever – urgent problems of science and practice (pp. 41–42). Pokrov. [in Russian]

Makarov V. V., Dzhupina S. I., Kolomytsev, A. A. (2001). Klassicheskaia chuma svinei – osobennosti epizooticheskogo protsessa i problemy na sovremennom etapie [Classical swine fever: Features of the epizootic process and problems at the present stage]. Agrarnaia Rossiia [Agrarian Russia], 3, 42–48. [in Russian]

Pryskoka V. A., Sobko Yu. A., Aranchii S. V. (2000). Klasychna chuma svynei (problemy ta perspektyvy) [Classical swine fever: Problems and prospects] (p. 180). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian]

World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). (2017). World Animal Health Information Database (WAHIS) Interface. http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Diseasecontrol/ measures

Liess B. (1987). Pathogenesis and epidemiology of hog cholera. Annales de Recherches Veterinaires, 18(2), 139–145. PMID: 3304111

Sobko Yu. A., Verhun L. Yu., Bilokon V. I., Temnikhanov Yu. D., Pryskoka V. A. (1998). Metodychni rekomendatsii po vyiavlenniu virusu klasychnoi chumy svynei ta vyznachenniu yoho infektsiinoi aktyvnosti v kulturi klityn immunoperoksydaznym metodom [Methodological recommendations for detection of classical swine fever virus and determination of its infectious activity in cell culture by the immunoperoxidase method]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian]

Chistiakov I. A. (1966). Statisticheskie metody v virusologicheskikh issledovaniiakh [Statistical methods in virological studies]. In V. N. Syurin (Ed.), Rukovodstvo po veterinarnoy virologii [Handbook of veterinary virology] (pp. 390–407). Moscow. [in Russian]

Downloads

Published

2025-10-10

How to Cite

Sytiuk, M., Obrazhei, A., Halka, I., & Gerilovych, A. (2025). Experience in controlling classical swine fever using booster vaccination. One Health Journal, 3(V), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2025-V-08

Issue

Section

Health and welfare, means of protection of animals

Most read articles by the same author(s)